I'm in the process of designing my own website. Here's one of the graphics I'm working on. I made it with Illustrator and Photoshop. What do you think?
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Sunday, June 24, 2007
My girlfriend's tattoo
To commemorate her college education and mark a milestone in her life, my girlfriend got a tattoo today. She would have gotten it done yesterday, but we waited in the tattoo parlor from 4:45 until 8:15 before we gave up waiting on the "just 15 more minutes" and set a new appointment. She really likes it, and I think it looks really good. Click "Read More" to see photos from the wonderful day at the parlor.
To begin with, here's the original artwork for the tattoo. She found a "teacher apple" magnet and I used Photoshop to clean up the image and add a sketch she did of her initials.
The process of tracing the image, resizing it to what she wanted, and actually tattooing it on her hip took about a half an hour. This was relieving after our 3.5 hour wait yesterday. Here's some photos of her in the middle of getting the tattoo. I think it hurt ...
I took her out for ice cream afterwards to celebrate once again the fact that she's a grad school graduate ... and also because ice cream makes any pain go away. Here's a photo of the final artwork. It should look a little better after it heals a bit. I'll try to give you an updated photo in a week or so.
After watching everything, I am fairly confident in my decision to not get a tatoo. It looks painful and besides, what if I don't feel the same way about the image five years down the road? Oh well, I'm still happy for her and hope she can always use it as something to remember Oregon by.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
Flexible Ethics
In one of my classes, we had a long discussion on ethics and flexible principles. I'm not sure exactly how I feel about it, so I wanted to kind of air my thoughts online and ask for input.
The example used was a job posting. In addition to the usual job responsibilities, the description listed additional requirements: male, age 30-35, send photo. Our instructor then asked us if the listing was OK. I immediately said no. That should be a given.
Our instructor then explained that listings like the example on the board were commonplace in Hong Kong and that requiring such things was perfectly legal. Legal or not, I argued that it was unethical. The instructor then wrote another description on the board: college degree, 10-13 years of experience, must be available for interview. He argued that it required mostly the same thing, that the candidate be roughly 30-35 (college graduates are typically 21-22 years old) and that gender and appearance would be easily determined in an in-person interview.
This is the usually practice in the US, where we pride ourselves on our "superior" sense of ethics. Our instructor explained that, while we may think we have certain ethical standards, we need to be flexible in different situations (i.e. hiring in Hong Kong).
I'm not so sure that merely being in a different place justifies different ethical standards. I try not to argue for cultural universalism, but I'm having trouble differentiating my support of unchangeable ethical principles from any sort of universalist stance. I recognize that you have to change your behaviors in different circumstances to fit local practices, but how far does this extend?
In certain places it is perfectly legal to treat women as inferior, to force children to work in factories, or to bribe public officials. I consider all of these activities unethical (some immoral), but if it's locally acceptable does it mean I should do them anyway? I know I'm using some extreme examples, but if you bend your ethics once, what's to stop you from bending them again to suit your needs at a particular time?
Now that everyone knows the dilemma in my head, would someone care to weigh in on it?
Thursday, June 07, 2007
The City of Roses
On one of my other blogs, I posted a video and critique of the Chinese government's use of pesticides. I referred to them as hypocritical for spraying pesticides over the heads of pedestrians while simultaneously promoting sustainability and environmental consciousness. I feel they are making a mistake and I'm not trying to propagate conspiracy theories, I just thought it would make for interesting debate.
Now is time for another debate, one much closer to home. The bike path I frequently take to campus has been under construction for quite some time. This is fine for me, because the construction will preserve the path and keep the hillside next to it from falling down. However, I have become upset with the way the city is constructing their retaining wall.
- They are using brand new sheets of plywood for the concrete forms. Even though they built the wall in sections, they would dispose of all their materials before moving on to the next section with completely brand new 2x4s, plywood sheets, and anchors.
- While I don't know if the wood was recycled elsewhere, I know the anchors used to hold the forms were just thrown away. Furthermore, they are to be buried behind the retaining wall rather than reused or recycled.
Here are some photos and the reasons I'm upset:
This first photo is just a small picture that shows several of the brackets lying on the ground 
behind the retaining wall. They're metal and plastic and are used to hold the wooden forms in place when pouring concrete.
What you do is put the bracket all the way through the void that is filled with concrete, let the cement harden, and then remove both the brackets and the wooden forms. While most of the brackets have to be cut, there is no reason the city can't recycle the metal and plastic. For those of you who've forgotten, plastic is a petroleum-based product. Gas prices are rising and we're running out of fossil fuels. The city is basically ignoring this reality and burying pieces of recyclable plastic they already have!
You're probably looking at the one photo thinking I'm making a big deal out of nothing. Here's another photo that shows the back of the retaining wall and the sheer number of brackets 
strewn behind it. Do you understand now why I'm so upset? We live in a city that prides itself on its leadership in the environmental sustainability movement, but our city's own construction employees are wasting materials!
Does it matter that we have special drainage gardens set up to filter street run off before it goes back into the streams? Does it matter if we have an extensive public transportation system and even a car share program to cut down on traffic and pollution? Not if we are displacing those conservation efforts in other areas. This is a situation where the right hand doesn't know (or care) what the left is doing. It's unacceptable.
Last month, the American Marketing Association organized its annual conference to focus on topics of sustainability. The number of people in attendance suggest to me that there are people in this city that care about what we're doing to the environment.
I'm just worried how much more of this wastefulness is going on elsewhere in town.
Friday, June 01, 2007
Writers of the Future
Well, the results are in. My story did not make it to the next round of judging. I'm a little disappointed, yes, but I take this as an opportunity to learn and move on to the next piece. I'll polish up what I have a bit and try to make it available to the public some time in the near future. Stay tuned!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
